Wikipedia is, “without exaggeration, the digital world’s factual foundation,” wrote Josh Dzieza recently. It’s a target because of that, squarely in the…
-
Science Communication Wikipedia Is Vital: Channeling Energy Into Micro-Edits Is a Win-Win-WinRead more
-
Science Communication Some Things I Like About the Expanding Wikipedia UniverseRead more
About a week ago, I created an English Wikipedia page for a woman who had an extraordinary life, and left a phenomenal…
-
Black History Month How-To Guide: Help Find Missing Scientists’ FacesRead more
Do you want to see more photos and stories of amazing women and other under-represented scientists? Sure you do! And you can…
-
Black History Month Black History Month: The Complicated Power of More Women Scientists’ FacesRead more
The photos are gorgeous. They’re uplifting. The images bring women we have not heard of before to life, shifting our own…
-
Black History Month Wikipedia Activism and Diversity in ScienceRead more
There’s no getting around it. A lot of scientists are white men, and it’s always been that way. But it’s never…
-
History Pentimento: Revealing the Women Obscured in Science’s HistoryRead more
Sometimes, beneath the surface layer, an artist’s earlier rendition of part of a painting can be glimpsed. Something was replaced, changed…
-
Personal Moving On, Open Access and Science Communication ImpactRead more
Sometimes, all the implications of a new commitment can become clear in a single, blinding flash. But other times, realization creeps up…
-
Science Communication Wassup, Wikipedia? Oh … wow!Read more
It’s one of the world’s most used websites – there are more than 20 billion page views a month. That’s hard to…
Showing 1 – 8 of 8 posts